<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Creative Process Part II</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blandfill.com/2009/12/10/creative-process-part-ii/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blandfill.com/2009/12/10/creative-process-part-ii/</link>
	<description>Whimmy Wham Wham Wozzle</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 06:00:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: World</title>
		<link>http://www.blandfill.com/2009/12/10/creative-process-part-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-359</link>
		<dc:creator>World</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 08:05:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blandfill.com/?p=340#comment-359</guid>
		<description>Hello, Tom.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello, Tom.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rachel</title>
		<link>http://www.blandfill.com/2009/12/10/creative-process-part-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-358</link>
		<dc:creator>rachel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 03:19:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blandfill.com/?p=340#comment-358</guid>
		<description>The creative process, I think, is just as important to the sciences. I don&#039;t remember which of my three bio classes it was (why/how did I do that to myself?), but we were talking about how so much of science moves forward from leaps of the imagination and from creativity, even if it&#039;s not &quot;orthodox&quot; or goes against what is generally accepted by the scientific community. Our knowledge about the world doesn&#039;t just keep steadily growing without some creativity. I think it&#039;s somewhat unappreciated in science.

Perhaps I&#039;m just restating what you&#039;re saying. If I am, oh well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The creative process, I think, is just as important to the sciences. I don&#8217;t remember which of my three bio classes it was (why/how did I do that to myself?), but we were talking about how so much of science moves forward from leaps of the imagination and from creativity, even if it&#8217;s not &#8220;orthodox&#8221; or goes against what is generally accepted by the scientific community. Our knowledge about the world doesn&#8217;t just keep steadily growing without some creativity. I think it&#8217;s somewhat unappreciated in science.</p>
<p>Perhaps I&#8217;m just restating what you&#8217;re saying. If I am, oh well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

